Re: s/redhat/system in package names

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Garrett Holmstrom <gholms@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On 5/10/2010 15:46, Casey Dahlin wrote:
>> On Sat, May 08, 2010 at 01:10:18AM +0200, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
>>> Long time ago, all *redhat* packages were renamed to "system*".
>>> But three of them are still alive: redhat-lsb, redhat-menus and redhat-rpm-config
>> 
>> I think s/redhat/fedora/ is the better choice for these particular
>> instances.

> If they aren't specific to only Fedora like fedora-release and 
> fedora-release-notes are, why put "fedora" in the package names at all?

The rpm-config package is certainly pretty specific to RHEL/Fedora.
Can't speak to the other two of my own knowledge ... but if they weren't
renamed the first time around, it's probably because people thought they
were distro-specific.  s/redhat/fedora/ seems a plausible solution
to me.

			regards, tom lane
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux