Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 16:21:54 -0500,
> Mike McGrath <mmcgrath@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Here's a list of f12 -> f13 with unclean update paths based on srpm.
>> I'll work with FES to to go through and get some builds out. Some might
>> make it in to F13 final, some will go out as F13-updates.
>>
>> greater for f12: rb_libtorrent
>> f12 = rb_libtorrent-0.14.10-1.fc12.src
>> f13 = rb_libtorrent-0.14.8-2.fc13.src
>
> That one was FTBFS for DSO linking issue. I supplied patches that should
> get it to build in F13 now.
>
>> greater for f12: viking
>> f12 = viking-0.9.92-1.fc12.src
>> f13 = viking-0.9.9-1.fc12.src
>
> viking was also FTBFS for DSO linking issue. I think new F13 builds have
> been done. Maybe this needs bohdi pushes?
>
>> greater for f12: spring
>> f12 = spring-0.81.2-1.fc12.src
>> f13 = spring-0.81.1.3-1.fc13.src
>
> Spring was also FTBFS with DSO linking issue. A successful F13 build was
> done in the last few days.
Do people realize now why this incompatible ld change was a bad idea,
especially at the release cycle stage it was done at?
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
