On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 09:38:45AM -0400, Colin Walters wrote: > On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 7:06 AM, Pierre-Yves <pingou@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Would it be allowed to try to restart gconfd ? > > It would make sense to SIGHUP gconfd after new schemas are installed, > yes. Note though we should really only be doing this once at the end > of a transaction when installation is complete. > My understanding was that with current Fedoras, gconf doesn't need this but I could be misremembering, missing a corner case, or just wrong :-) What are the cases that we need to still send a sighup to gconf? (or is this a workaround for an undiagnosed bug in the guake gconf schema?) We can't do this only once at the end of a transaction but if I'm remembering a different discussion, doing it multiple times at the end of the rpm transaction should be almost as good (since gconf will wait for a few moments from getting the first SIGHUP to see if it will get any other ones.) Is that correct? -Toshio
Attachment:
pgpefb9e3OcHc.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
