On Tue, 2010-05-04 at 19:49 -0400, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 04:21:54PM -0500, Mike McGrath wrote: > > Here's a list of f12 -> f13 with unclean update paths based on srpm. > > I'll work with FES to to go through and get some builds out. Some might > > make it in to F13 final, some will go out as F13-updates. > > > > greater for f12: fusecompress > > f12 = fusecompress-2.6-6.20100223git754bc0de.fc12.src > > f13 = fusecompress-2.6-5.fc13.src > > So there's a discrepancy somewhere here: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fusecompress > That shows that we have: > fusecompress-2.6-6.20100223git754bc0de.fc13 > > pushed to stable on 2010-03-03 08:15:43 > > The package is not in the repository, though -- Is this a sign that > a particular push failed? > > -Toshio It probably means that there was a race condition and a second (older) update got pushed. Yep. the 2.6-6 went to dist-f13 March 2, the 2.6-5 build went in March 4th. I've fixed up the tags here. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
