Re: Thunderbird bz 579023 still not fixed even though there is an upstream fix available

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Christopher Aillon wrote:
> You really don't see the value in having the engineers that own the code
> give technical review?

I don't think this should be a requirement for each and every patch to ANY 
Fedora package.

It is generally not necessary and delays fixing bugs a lot.

> Anyway, it's unfortunate that this really isn't done more often.  I
> really think that as a project, we'd be doing a lot better if we
> mandated upstream review before applying patches to any package if you
> aren't an upstream maintainer of the code.  As it is now, it's somewhat
> scary to think how many packagers would take a bugfix patch and apply it
> without being able to figure out if there's a potential hidden exploit
> in it...

And you think the average upstream is any better at this? Seriously?

        Kevin Kofler

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux