Re: Add mercurial to development group?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2010-04-29 at 00:21 +0200, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 28.04.2010, 15:41 -0400 schrieb Neal Becker:
> 
> > IMO, mercurial should have the same status as git.  git is default.  Should 
> > we take a vote?
> 
> -1 on mercurial then

-1 here also.

Later,
/B
-- 
Brian Pepple <bpepple@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Bpepple
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E
BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B  CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux