Re: primary arch and buildsys arch are not in sync

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 04/28/2010 06:40 PM, Jon Masters wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-04-28 at 16:54 +0200, Farkas Levente wrote:
>
>> now as ppc was removed from primary arch i try to build gstreamer-java
>> as a noarch packages. until now it was not possible because of this jdk
>> bug on ppc:
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468831
>> http://icedtea.classpath.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190
>> http://icedtea.classpath.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=268
>> but now i assume as ppc is not a primary arch it's possible to change to
>> noarch, but i was wrong. even if ppc is not a primary arch there are
>> buildhost which are ppc. so the build fail since java compiler crash:
>> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2143327
>> imho it's a bug and all buildhost should have to replaced to x86 x86_64
>> hosts.
>> or ...?
>
> This has been brought up a number of times before. I know they're
> looking at the buildhost selection for the SRPM generation but in the
> interim I've heard the "solution" is to just re-submit and hope you get
> an x86/x86_64 host selected the next time :)

nice. why can't koji choose in this way?

-- 
   Levente                               "Si vis pacem para bellum!"
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux