On 2010-04-26 21:54:13，"Thomas Janssen" <thomasj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote：
>Ah, no thanks. I have packages without a co-maintainer and i don't
>want anyone be able to fiddle with it. May the package or fix be
>trivial or not. I prefer to have a provenpackager for that.
>Ah, no thanks. I have packages without a co-maintainer and i don't
>want anyone be able to fiddle with it. May the package or fix be
>trivial or not. I prefer to have a provenpackager for that.
This could be done with a QA page which compares upstream version and rawhide version. A trival package(like former fedora extras) without a co-maintainer which lags for more than 3 months should be editable for all others.
We can also leave a choice like "packager group members can commit" like "provenpackager group members can commit". This may benifit fedora a lot to be a bleed-edge OS.
Regards,
网易免费域名邮箱正式上线
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
