On 04/26/2010 07:05 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 04/26/2010 10:52 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: >> On 04/26/2010 02:11 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: >>> Well, may-be FESCO should decide upon on whether the FSF's >>> "freedom 3" [1] is a inclusion/exclusion criterion for packages in >>> Fedora. >>> >>> Ralf >>> >>> [1] http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html >>> >> >> It is (except for firmware) > > ... and on Fedora's own trademark encumbered packages. No. Only firmware. Fedora's trademarks are not a problem at all. http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/common-distros.html. > Well, Mozilla license definitely is an open-source license. > It's just that the Mozilla packages in Fedora are non-free. How? Your claim here is certainly not supported by the FSF. although they have some issues with the recommendation of non-free plugins and if you consider it a legal question, it is outside the scope of FESCo. FESCo can still discuss it from a policy perspective but then pointing to FSF guidelines confuses a policy discussion with a legal one. Rahul -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
