On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 5:08 PM, Bruno Wolff III <bruno@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 09:47:26 +0200, > Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Those packages are also sometimes not compliant with Fedora policies such as >> usage of system libraries because any patches to use a system library need >> trademark approval. This is also just unacceptable. See e.g. the Hunspell >> fiasco: > > Isn't this a FESCO issue? Maybe it is time to reopen this issue? > > I don't see how using Mozilla trademarks provides significant benefit > to Fedora. By shipping software using names known to users coming from other OSes? Btw. the fedora trademark guidelines aren't less restrictive either. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
