> On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 11:44 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Devrim =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=DCND=DCZ?= <fedora-list at gunduz.org> writes: > > On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 16:40 +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251805#c28 > >> > >> Should we have: > >> postgresql-pgpool-II > >> postgresql-orafce > >> > >> or just: > >> pgpool-II > >> orafce > >> > >> Let start discussing. My opinion is postgresql-* because it has kind > >> of same namespace. > > > Let's get rid of postgresql- prefixes. They don't match upstream names > > and they are just useless. > > FWIW, I've recently renamed postgresql-tcl and postgresql-python to > better match their upstream project names, so I guess that's precedent > for Devrim's position. > > regards, tom lane > It's also worth noting what other distributions do, do they honor the > upstream names or pre/postpend some sort of identifier? If I check in the Ubuntu Lucid repository, orafce is packaged as postgresql-8.3-orafce, same for Debian. OpenSuse and Mandriva don't seem to ship orafce. -- Jean-Francois Saucier (djf_jeff) GPG key : 0xA9E6E953
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
