Re: Thunderbird bz 579023 still not fixed even though there is an upstream fix available

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Apr 22, 2010, at 9:13 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:

> On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 03:18 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> 
>>> And even if the Fedora Thunderbird maintainer decides to push a
>>> patched package to F-12, there's no way it should be pushed directly
>>> to stable.
>> 
>> Why not, if it contains an important fix?
> 
> Because if we don't test the updated package we don't know:
> 
> a) does it actually fix the bug?
> b) does it break anything else?
> 
> Just because an update 'contains an important fix' doesn't mean it's
> fine to release it without testing.

I'll test it. I don't need it in stable right away...

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux