In article <1271556200.29034.1.camel@localhost> you wrote: > On Sat, 2010-04-17 at 04:46 +0000, Ben Boeckel wrote: >> Hi, >> >> With X no longer using HAL for device configuration, what the status of >> completely replacing HAL? I know udev, upower, and udisks are destined >> to replace it, but since I run a tight setup and HAL is not in the >> "Minimal" install on the F-13 media, I was wondering when a setup >> completely without HAL would be possible (upower currently depends on it >> through pm-utils). Thanks. > > We are tracking the progress towards hal removal here: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/HalRemoval This is the result of `yum install pm-utils` on my machine: ================================= ---> Package pm-utils.i686 0:1.2.6.1-1.fc13 set to be updated --> Processing Dependency: radeontool for package: pm-utils-1.2.6.1-1.fc13.i686 --> Processing Dependency: hal for package: pm-utils-1.2.6.1-1.fc13.i686 --> Processing Dependency: hdparm for package: pm-utils-1.2.6.1-1.fc13.i686 --> Processing Dependency: vbetool for package: pm-utils-1.2.6.1-1.fc13.i686 <snip more dep checks> Installing: pm-utils i686 1.2.6.1-1.fc13 fedora 110 k Installing for dependencies: dmidecode i686 1:2.10-1.39.fc12 fedora 64 k hal i686 0.5.14-3.fc13 fedora 372 k hal-filesystem i686 0.5.14-3.fc13 fedora 31 k hal-info noarch 20090716-3.fc12 fedora 51 k hal-libs i686 0.5.14-3.fc13 fedora 66 k hdparm i686 9.27-1.fc13 fedora 75 k radeontool i686 1.5-6.fc12 fedora 9.2 k vbetool i686 1.2.2-1.fc12 fedora 20 k ================================= The wiki states that pm-utils is hal-free. Maybe the hard dep in the RPM needs looked at? --Ben -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
