On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 08:38:52PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > seriously? I don't think I ever said the list was all inclusive. > And in my original reply I only asked some questions related to > packages being considered "potentially unmaintained". Is there a secret definition of "potentially" which I am unaware of and which is causing grief here? -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx> Senior Systems Architect -- Instructional & Research Computing Services Harvard School of Engineering & Applied Sciences -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
