On Wed, 2010-04-14 at 15:51 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: > Matt McCutchen wrote: > > Please take the request seriously. If Tuju is right that most users > > would be better off with the older version, then that's what Fedora > > should ship. > > I appreciate the comment, but that oversimplifies things quite a bit. there > are a lot of other packages and issues and bugs involved here. Reverting > even part or all as you suggest would have far bigger bad consequences than > helping fix the primary bug/app at issue here. > > Fact is... qa'ing this, in updates-testing or kde-testing or whatever, and > finding the root cause(s), in part failed to catch this in time (prior to > push to stable updates). The best (and honestly only) way forward is to > better document things (userbase.kde.org ftw!) and to continue working > toward the goal noble of making everything just work. I'm not oversimplifying: by "most users would be better with the older version", I meant to include such integration consequences. I'll believe you that the answer is no. You should have given this answer to Tuju's original question rather than snippily dismissing it. -- Matt -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
