On Wed 14 April 2010 6:53:24 am Thomas Janssen wrote: > On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Juha Tuomala <Juha.Tuomala@xxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, 12 Apr 2010, Ryan Rix wrote: > >> On Mon 12 April 2010 6:40:59 am Juha Tuomala wrote: > >>> I recall, that the earlier version had some level of Akonadi support > >>> as well, so in theory, would it be possible to revert the codebase > >>> back to the one that can actually be used? > >> > >> Sure, try `man yum`. > > > > You mean that we're here to solve our own problems, not to make a > > good distribution for great public? > > We *have* a good distribution for great public. Kaddressbook works as > expected for me. If you have a problem with it, ask for help and you > get help. > You got the right answer for what you asked. *You* want the older > version. Good luck downgrading and have fun with it. I suggested that Juha fix his issue by downgrading simply because of this. He was the same person who has been complaining about KAddressbook in 4.4 since its initial release, two months ago. Ryan -- Ryan Rix == http://hackersramblings.wordpress.com | http://rix.si/ ==
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
