Re: potentially unmaintained packages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Wed, 14 Apr 2010, Michael Schwendt wrote:

> On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 17:03:55 -0400 (EDT), Seth wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>   I worked on a script back in January which produced a list of packages
>> that needed to be looked at. The reason was that the pkg had not been
>> built by koji into dist-rawhide by a non-automated process in more than 6
>> months.
>
> Why would it need to be rebuilt manually?

I never said it would. I just said it hadn't been rebuilt by a 
non-automated process.


> It's stable, works, and is still being used by dependencies. Would I
> rebuild just for fun (and possibly introduce bugs related to temporary
> issues with compilation, RPM, or other build deps)?

I never said you had to rebuild it. I think I tried very hard to make it 
clear that this list was just to give folks a heads up.

-sv

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux