On Tue, 2010-04-13 at 12:55 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > >>>>> "AW" == Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > AW> I think it was just a thinko for 'review'. > > In which case, why would a sponsor be required at all? James is in the > packager group, so he could just do the review. According to the ticket > in question, a sponsor for the packager is required (FE-NEEDSPONSOR is > blocked). I take it from your response that you're not interested in reviewing and sponsoring this package review request? Apologies if I have my facts wrong. According to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process, since ... 1. this is the first package up for review from pmuller 2. and, I'm not a member of sponsor of the packager group ... the review must be done by a Sponsor. Since this review request was not processed by a Sponsoer, I've provided my review comments to help the discussion. So the question stands, is there anyone interested in reviewing this package (who is also sponsor in the packager group). Thanks, James
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
