On Tue, 2010-04-13 at 00:28 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to discuss the possibility to add the patch described in > this report in comps for F-13 and later. > https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/3565 > > The basic idea is to make libproxy default installed plugins more in > shape with the actual set of installed packages for a given system. > That, so application using libproxy will discover or receive the proxy > configuration automatically as soon as they use system settings. > > As I agree that this change appears rather late in the Fedora process, > and libproxy is indeed in the crithpath for updates (why actually?!), > I would give an opportunity to discuss this more widely. > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libproxy-0.3.1-4.fc13 > > So the other question is : Is there any problem in adding this change > to comps for F-13 ? > https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/attachment/ticket/3565/adds-libproxy2comps.patch > > As a record, on a default install and without this change: libproxy is > pointless. > But If one want to use libproxy, he will have to figure out which > packages to install manually. This patch assume a reasonable default, > so having libproxy installed just make sense. I'm in favor of this change. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
