On Fri, 2010-04-09 at 19:57 -0400, Matt McCutchen wrote: > On Fri, 2010-04-09 at 15:32 -0800, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > > When someone is publishing updates and putting them into testing > > specifically to address known bugs... and they get the fix wrong in > > some way... I think its perfectly acceptable to reuse the same update > > notice for the testing packages in order to do a series of such test > > packages...letting intermediate test packages expire out of existence. > > > > You can make the same argument about confusion in the bugzilla > > comments to. Unless people take the time to state which version they > > are using in every comment if there are several intermediate attempts > > to fix a bug handed out to users..whether it be via bodhi or even just > > koji builds..bug reports get harder to follow...unless people state > > which versions they are testing. And I certainly wouldn't expect > > people to refile a new bug report each time a testing package is spun > > up just to keep the flow of commentary clear as to which version > > everyone was referring to when they were providing feedback. > > The comparison to bugs is not valid. A bug is the same bug until it is > fixed. An update consisting of different packages is a different > update. Better comparison: Bugzilla does not allow the content of an attachment to be edited once it is submitted. Instead, people submit a new attachment and obsolete the old one. -- Matt -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
