On Sat, 2010-04-10 at 01:20 +0200, Till Maas wrote: > On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 07:10:59PM -0400, Matt McCutchen wrote: > > The log of the following update shows that it was submitted five times, > > I assume with newer packages each time: > > > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/NetworkManager-0.8.0-6.git20100408.fc12,ModemManager-0.3-9.git20100409.fc12 > > > > The top of the page now shows the newest package versions, but much of > > the feedback referred to older versions, which are not listed. IMO, > > this is a terribly confusing practice and Bodhi shouldn't allow it. New > > packages should be submitted in a new update so that feedback remains > > associated with the correct package versions. > > > > Thoughts? Am I missing something? > > There are nine bugs mentioned in the update. Do you really suggest that > the update submitter should always manually copy them from an old update > to a new update? > > But it would be nice if Bodhi would support to create a new update using > an old update as a template, then editing the builds attached to an > update would probably not be needed. That would be nice. Though in the end, as long as the update has not reached stable, is editing a testing update to fix regressions really that big of a deal... Dan -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
