W dniu 09.04.2010 11:42, Thomas Vander Stichele pisze: > Hi, > >> Anyway, when it comes to the update, I'm happy to help. The total number >> of downstream packages dependent on twisted is 33. Should we expect >> breakage? Were there any API changes in twisted? > > Twisted in general is really good about keeping API, but they do > deprecate stuff. When they do so they typically make it clear with > DeprecationWarning's. I think it's mostly just a matter of testing the > applications using it by someone who knows the application. > > Just to be clear, we want to do this for F-13 only, right ? Or are you > thinking about upgrading F-12 too ? Well, F-13 for sure. Then, depending if hell breaks loose or not, we might think about other branches. >> I think we could start by dividing the list of the packages fifty-fifty, >> and check if they work at all. > > Do you have newly built twisted packages ? Not yet, but I can try to prepare them over the weekend. >> Then, I think it would be a good idea to >> bring maintainers into the loop since they actually know what the >> packages are supposed to do. The cleaned-up list follows below: > >> desktopcouch-0:0.6.3-3.fc12.noarch > > I didn't know this was in already; I'm going to assume they're based on > my packages from a few months ago but I'll check. > >> elisa-base-0:0.5.35-2.fc12.noarch >> elisa-plugins-bad-0:0.5.35-2.fc12.noarch >> elisa-plugins-ugly-0:0.5.35-1.fc11.noarch > > I can check these. > >> flumotion-0:0.6.1-1.fc12.x86_64 > > This is mine, I'll take this. > >> python-desktopcouch-0:0.6.3-3.fc12.noarch > > Same as desktopcouch above. > >> python-nevow-0:0.9.32-3.fc12.noarch > > nevow is another library - not sure if anything else depends on nevow. > > Thomas > Julian -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
