Re: Using capabilities for libpcap apps

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Quoting Radek Vokál (radekvokal@xxxxxxxxx):
> On 04/08/2010 10:49 PM, Steve Grubb wrote:
> > On Tuesday 06 April 2010 04:47:22 pm Radek Vokál wrote:
> >>    I need few suggestions about this ..
> >> https://blog.wireshark.org/2010/02/running-wireshark-as-you/ .. Gerald
> >> Combs, the upstream maintainer of wireshark, suggests to use
> >> capabilities instead of consolehelper+root privileges for
> >> dumpcap/wireshark. It makes whole lot of sense, so I've looked if other
> >> apps in Fedora are already using it and I haven't found any. Honestly
> >> I'm not sure about right way to use them. The idea is to add something
> >> like following to %post
> >>
> >> # groupadd -g wireshark
> >> # chgrp wireshark /usr/bin/dumpcap
> >> # setcap cap_net_raw,cap_net_admin+eip /usr/bin/dumpcap
> >> # setcap cap_net_raw,cap_net_admin+eip /usr/bin/tshark
> >>
> >> Suggestions? Ideas? Spec file patches?
> >
> > rpm supposedly has native support for capabilities. That would mean that you
> > don't need to call setcap.
> >
> > -Steve
> >
> 
> Are there any docs for that? I haven't found any so far.

Thread starting here:

http://www.mail-archive.com/rpm-maint@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg01015.html

-serge
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux