Re: PolicyKit-authentication-agents in Fedora

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Friday 09 April 2010 02:27:59 Christoph Wickert wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 08.04.2010, 17:01 -0700 schrieb Jesse Keating:
> > Part of the solution here is to not rely entirely on yum depsolving, and
> > instead add explicitly which polkit you want in the comps group, so that
> > a provider is already selected.
> 
> Yes, I already wrote that in my very first mail. Additionally one core
> component of each desktop (e.g. gnome-session, kdebase-workspace,
> xfce4-session and lxsession) should also explicitly require the agent

We explicitly require polkit-kde from F-12 in combination with polkit-1 (in 
kdebase-workspace). F-11 still require PolicyKit-authentication-agent.

Library/desktop purist, don't read it :D: For non Gnome/KDE environments it 
could be nice to have something less bloated but first criteria should be 
quality of implementation and that's where -gnome one wins (I don't know how 
mature is lxde one) - it's developed by polkit developers. We are on slip 
while trying to catch current development. 

Jaroslav

> > This is what we should do for critpath as well, mark the gnome policy
> > kit explicitly as part of the critpath.
> 
> +1
> 
> Regards,
> Christoph

-- 
Jaroslav Řezník <jreznik@xxxxxxxxxx>
Software Engineer - Base Operating Systems Brno

Office: +420 532 294 275
Mobile: +420 602 797 774
Red Hat, Inc.                               http://cz.redhat.com/
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux