Am Donnerstag, den 08.04.2010, 19:05 -0400 schrieb Tony Nelson: > On 10-04-08 14:13:01, Christoph Wickert wrote: [snipped] > > I never said it is a useful decision rationale, it's something we > > cannot avoid. I agree it's not useful, but please address your > > complainants to the yum developers. > ... > > Would it work to change the name to "polkit-lxpolkit" and have it > Provide lxpolkit? Then polkit-kde would win and it has even more deps. ;) Not sure if we should change the name from what upstream uses. IMO first of all yum's depsolver should be enhanced. Matthias already made an important point here. Regards, Christoph P.S. /me wonders what would happen if we had polkit-gtk and polkit-kde with the same provides and the same length of the name.. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
