Re: Upstream bugs vs. Fedora bugs: KDE people do it wrong

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 31/03/10 13:34, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> On Wednesday 31 March 2010 14:20:40 Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>> On 03/31/2010 11:32 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>>> On 03/31/2010 02:55 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>>>> If your "unworthy bug" doesn't cause malfunctions, you could easily
>>>> close it "WONTFIX" and add a comment.
>>>
>>> Why do you advocate WONTFIX over FIXED RAWHIDE?
>>
>> Because it is how s user perceives it.
>>
>> His bug is not fixed in the Fedora release he filed the bug against.
>
> So there should be a COMMENT why it's closed in rawhide only - usually rawhide
> bugs should be closed in rawhide. But sometimes the fix could lead to difficult
> backport etc... So the only way is to fix it in Rawhide only.

As an end user a comment as such would be welcome.
If' it's important enough to the end user.
They are more informed.


-- 
Regards,

Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded, Fedora.x86_64
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux