Re: Upstream bugs vs. Fedora bugs: KDE people do it wrong

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 31/03/10 12:25, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> On Wednesday 31 March 2010 12:55:58 Frank Murphy wrote:
>> On 31/03/10 11:50, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
>>> On Wednesday 31 March 2010 12:26:17 Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>>>> On 03/31/2010 03:45 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
>>>>> which will make fixing bugs in current even more important.
>>>>
>>>> Not at all.  Either the bug is important to fix in the current release
>>>> or it is not.  Telling users to get it from Rawhide was never a valid
>>>> resolution.  It is a workaround in some very small cases.
>>>
>>> For example bug report - typo in SPEC file - it should be fixed in
>>> Rawhide, but no need to push this update to current releases.
>>
>> But why would an end user be worried about a typo in a spec file?
>
> Other developer, not provenpackager one?
>
> Jaroslav
>

But isn't the run of the thread about "normal user" and bugs.
Closing or otherwise.

-- 
Regards,

Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded, Fedora.x86_64
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux