Re: Upstream bugs vs. Fedora bugs: KDE people do it wrong

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wednesday 31 March 2010 12:57:30 Michal Hlavinka wrote:
> On Wednesday 31 March 2010 12:50:10 Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > On Wednesday 31 March 2010 12:26:17 Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > > On 03/31/2010 03:45 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> > > > which will make fixing bugs in current even more important.
> > > 
> > > Not at all.  Either the bug is important to fix in the current release
> > > or it is not.  Telling users to get it from Rawhide was never a valid
> > > resolution.  It is a workaround in some very small cases.
> > 
> > For example bug report - typo in SPEC file - it should be fixed in
> > Rawhide, but no need to push this update to current releases.
> 
> Well, I was thinking about example too, but for this case I usually fix all
> releases, and leave bug in modified. This way all people get the fix later
> when something more important comes.

This goes to current release every Rawhide sync (applies for KDE).

Jaroslav

> Michal

-- 
Jaroslav Řezník <jreznik@xxxxxxxxxx>
Software Engineer - Base Operating Systems Brno

Office: +420 532 294 275
Mobile: +420 602 797 774
Red Hat, Inc.                               http://cz.redhat.com/
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux