Срд, 2004-06-23 у 00:12, Florian La Roche написав: > > So as an alternative, I'd like to move autopoint (and probably more > > development tools) into gettext-devel. See bug #126071. This brings up > > the main point: a lot of packages presently BuildRequire: gettext, and I > > think all of them will need to change to gettext-devel. This is the > > list from rawhide: > > I think this exactly shows why it does not make sense to list buildreqs > in too much detail. gettext/texinfo/auto*/libtool etc all should be > required elsewhere. I reported about missing buildreq perl-XML-Parser for several packages. The majority of these reports have been accepted, but once the answer was (approximately so) " I do not want to add dependencies on base packages, such as automake ..." Whether there is a list of packages which are considered base for build? If I have this list, I will not report about missing buildreqs on such packages. -- Maxim V. Dziumanenko <mvd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
