Re: Upstream bugs vs. Fedora bugs: KDE people do it wrong

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am Montag, den 29.03.2010, 21:05 +0200 schrieb Thomas Spura:
> Am Montag, den 29.03.2010, 19:47 +0200 schrieb Oliver Falk:
> > I also agree with "Fine". Pkg maintainers are responsible for their pkgs. And of course not everybody is able to fix any kind of bug...
> 
> I also agree with Christoph. Pkg maintainers should file bugs upstream,
> when getting a bug report and not just closing anyhow and let the
> reporter do their job (and saying 'I watch them upstream').


By the way:
What is RH bugzilla for, when not using for bugs in fedora?
Closing and letting the bug reporter reporting the bug again on upstream
means RH bugzilla could directly be disabled for the packages, where
maintainers behave like this...

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux