Re: Fedora has become fat!

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 7:50 PM, Christoph Wickert
<christoph.wickert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Why has Fedora become so fat in the F13 development cycle?
>
>      * The LXDE Spin has grown from 464 MB to 509 MB [1] without a
>        single change in the Spin. There actually was a change, SLIM was
>        replaced with LXDM, but LXDM is actually smaller because it
>        doesn't require the desktop-brackgrounds package
>      * The Xfce spin has grown from 697 MB to 744 MB [2] without major
>        changes. In fact, we dropped totem and gftp, which is at least
>        10 MB.
>
> Any ideas what made Fedora become so fat or how to further investigate
> this?
>
> Regards,
> Christoph
> [1]
> http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/nightly-composes/lxde/logs/SIZEHISTORY-i386
> [2]
> http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/nightly-composes/xfce/logs/SIZEHISTORY-i386
>
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>

Could it be related to the dracut issue we ran into during the F12 build cycle?

-AdamM

-- 
http://maxamillion.googlepages.com
---------------------------------------------------------
()  ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\  www.asciiribbon.org   - against proprietary attachments
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux