Re: Rawhide signatures

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2004-06-22 at 16:34 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> Le mar, 22/06/2004 Ã 10:19 -0400, Dan Williams a Ãcrit :
> > AFAIK this is the case.  Packages that are part of a "release", ie
> > Fedora Core x, or FCx Test x, are signed.  Between releases, if a
> > package gets revved over the signed version, it is unsigned until the
> > next release.
> 
> Yep, that is why I wrote a rawhide key would be great.
> I don't mind (well, I do but I'm ready to pay this price) if my data is
> eaten by a buggy rawhide package. But I'd really love to be sure I only
> install Quality Rawhide Bugware and not malware someone injected in a
> compromised mirror.

There is rawhide key. However, it is not used properly :|

The point here is more to be sure that we have the packages the
developers intended us to have than of giving any warranty in as so far
as integrity against trojans !

Rui

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux