Re: F-13 Branched report: 20100317 changes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: F-13 Branched report: 20100317 changes
From: Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2010 07:41:28 +0100
Delivered-to: devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Followup-to: gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel
Reply-to: Development discussions related to Fedora <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: KNode/4.4.1

Thomas Spura wrote:
> Why testing?
> 
> A "maybe-broken update" is better than a "non-working programm" isn't
> it?

+1, broken dependency fixes should go stable ASAP.

        Kevin Kofler

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

References:
- F-13 Branched report: 20100317 changes
  - From: Branched Report
- Re: F-13 Branched report: 20100317 changes
  - From: Rakesh Pandit
- Re: F-13 Branched report: 20100317 changes
  - From: Thomas Spura

Prev by Date: Re: F-13 Branched report: 20100317 changes
Next by Date: Re: F-13 Branched report: 20100317 changes
Previous by thread: Re: F-13 Branched report: 20100317 changes
Next by thread: your favourite method of dealing with ssh brute force attacks
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Fedora Announce] [Fedora Kernel] [Fedora Testing] [Fedora Formulas] [Fedora PHP Devel] [Kernel Development] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Maintainers] [Fedora Desktop] [PAM] [Red Hat Development] [Gimp] [Yosemite News]

Powered by Linux