On Tue, 2010-03-16 at 21:46 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 15:46:16 -0400, James wrote: > > > Rpmfusion can run auto QA like tests on rpmfusion and Fedora (I don't > > think we can legally do the same ... but I'm not sure). Finding the file > > conflicts automatically is harder (you need to download all the rpms), > > and it's not fast, but it's possible (Seth has a script, IIRC). > > I've created and published a proof-of-concept script a couple of times > before. It's the one I've used to file all those bugs about conflicts > in Rawhide. > http://mschwendt.fedorapeople.org/confcheck-remote-split2.py > (that's a more experimental version that tries to work with just 1GB of RAM) > It does not download all packages, but just the headers. For packages > stored in a local mirror, the speed isn't too bad. It ran approx. 11 minutes > with remote Rawhide, though, on an average dual core machine. > > Will Woods/autoqa features a conflicts checker, too, > https://fedorahosted.org/pipermail/autoqa-results/2010-March/date.html > which is why I haven't continued with filing further tickets or with > enhancing my script. hi, Is there a wiki page with more info on this script please? How it's to be used etc.? -- regards, Ankur - FAS : ankursinha ; franciscod @ Freenode - gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 5E9BF638
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel