Re: gdbm soname change in Rawhide, package rebuild needed

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jesse Keating (jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx) said: 
> > However, it makes no sense to use compat-gdbm for a long time, as the 
> > API is the same, and no source code changes are needed in packages using 
> > gdbm-1.8.0 to use gdbm-1.8.3.
> 
> I don't see much problem with removing compat-gdbm once all our
> dependent packages are rebuilt.

My concern would be if gdbm is a widely-enough used ABI that we'd want
to keep it like we keep compat-db or compat-openssl.

Bill
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux