-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Thorsten Leemhuis from RPMFusion said why this is the case at the FUDCon 09 in Berlin and it will continue to be the case if nothing changes: No collaboration and total underappreciation of RPMFusion's work. We cannot legally endorse RPMFusion but we could very well collaborate with them "under the hood", which doesn't happen at all - at least not to my knowledge. On 03/16/2010 09:50 AM, Ankur Sinha wrote: > I did notice that. I wasn't sure why a package from rpmfusion would > conflict with one from fedora repos. (It's in rpmfusion for a reason) > Is it being obsoleted by a fedora package (license been cleared or > something)? > - -- Alexander Kahl GNU/Linux Software Developer -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkuffU0ACgkQVTRddCFHw11mVQCgv44KlLFxqfnJ6rCN33MGj4tL NBQAoKx790efBviXFZ4nkz6+RVJYVd0y =DbYv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
