On Friday 12 March 2010 04:54:43 pm Jesse Keating wrote: > On Fri, 2010-03-12 at 14:56 +0100, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > > How does this proposal go with upgrades? I think stable updates + > > upgrades are tight together. Are we going to be more conservative in new > > releases too? Extend "stable" release life time? LTS? > > Fedora needs to be free to innovate, and that means we need to be free > to introduce substantial changes between our releases, so no, this > policy does not apply to changes between say F-13 and F-14, only to > changes /to/ F-13 once it has been released. But this is real issue - very conservative release updates with very aggressive upgrades every 6 months, forcing users to upgrade every (and only) 1 year. You can't decouple updates/upgrades. That's why I'd like to see "slowing down" approach of updates. Jaroslav -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
