On Fri, 2010-03-12 at 17:04 -0500, Chris Ball wrote: > > But (and I mean this with no disrespect to anyone else) I am not > > going to want to use it seriously when it means rolling back > > everything that changed since installing updates (sure, if the > > update is a kernel update and you literally rebooted the second > > the update happened, doing nothing else - but most updates don't > > bite me until I try to use some app later). > > That's fine -- don't use it. It will offer a solution to people whose > system is hosed enough that they're willing to put up with having to > manually pick up user files that changed since the update containing > the broken packages happened, and offering a solution for that > disasterous case is better than not offering one. It makes it so > that more people can use Rawhide than would otherwise be able to. Absolutely. I'm not against any of this, I'm just against the suggestion that was made that it is a solution for botched updates in general (i.e. in released, e.g. on my future F13 stable system). It *is* a great solution for the "OMG, I'm so hosed" like other OS's I could mention already have, and especially if /home is on a different LV. Jon. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
