On Tuesday 09 March 2010 04:41:07 pm Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Tue, 9 Mar 2010 16:54:16 -0500, Bill wrote: > > 20:59:11 <dgilmore> Kevin_Kofler: i dont see Michael Schwendt as > > infulencial. he choose to largely abstain from fedora years ago > > Huh? Now, what exactly is your problem with me? > What the heck are you referring to? Sorry for not responding to you earlier. i choose not to read devel@ due to how poisonous it has been i marked the 1700 odd emails read and carried on. I have nothing against you at all. I was referring to things like http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-advisory-board/2007-June/msg00120.html Where rather than work with fedora as you previously had you chose to be less involved. which is perfectly fine and ok. however i should have not said anything when Kevin Brought up your name. I sent you a private apology. and ill say again here sorry i should not have said anything it was not appropriate for me to do so Dennis
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
