On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 23:21 +0100, Sven Lankes wrote: > On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 09:59:29PM +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > > Before being added to updates, the package must receive a net karma of > > +3 in Bodhi. > > [...] > > > It is the expectation of Fesco that the majority of updates should > > easily be able to garner the necessary karma in a minimal space of time. > > I don't know what to say. > > If Fesco is aiming at getting rid of all the pesky packagers maintaining low > profile packages: You're well on your way. I usually stay away from mega-threads, but well put! I doubt that even major bug fixes in any of my (small) packages, ever got more than 1-2 karma votes. Many got zero - not even a vote by the original bug report owner! Why am I getting punished because some package didn't get enough testing (due to the low visibility of update-testing?) before it was pushed into -updates and caused breakage? Either we (package maintainers) are qualified to make sane decisions about our package or we are not. I don't really see a middle ground here. I wonder if it's not high time to return the distinction between core and extra functionality. - Gilboa -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
