On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 15:43:04 -0500, James Laska <jlaska@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > 1. repoclosure/conflicts - no package update can introduce broken > deps or conflicts. I'd recommend we apply this to both > 'updates-testing' and 'updates' (but that's detailed below) > 2. Package sanity > * No rpmlint failures > * Is the Source properly defined > * License review/examination (if possible) > * Upstream Source match tarball > * Package scriptlet syntax checks > 3. Package must be newer than previously released versions - can't > ship newer package in N-1. > 4. Any additional MUST requirements folks would like to see covered > from the package review requirements? File conflicts (assuming that "conflicts" above referred to just conflicts dependencies). -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
