On Wednesday, March 10, 2010, 7:24:18 AM, Mathieu Bridon wrote: > On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 13:06, Steven I Usdansky > Your proposal especially doesn't address the third point. How do > effectively you rollback the package on the mirrors when you don't > control them? Assuming reversion to an older version of the package is not a frequent event, having only the main repository house the necessary delta files might work out well. The additional network load for reversions should be containable at the master. It has a number of advantages in that additional information about package reversions can be collected: - Basic statistics about the original and reverted package versions. - Require that the user be prompted for a reason for the reversion, and even more valuable information is collected. Al -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
