On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 16:08 -0800, Josh Stone wrote: > On 03/09/2010 03:43 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > James Laska wrote: > >> 3. Package must be newer than previously released versions - can't > >> ship newer package in N-1. > > > > Definitely, but we must make sure that it's still possible to queue the same > > update for N and N-1 at the same time (= without having to wait for a push > > between queueing N and queueing N-1). > > I'm in the habit of queuing for N and N-1 in a single bodhi request. Is > this addressed by any of our existing or proposed update policies? > > It seems to cast doubt on the value of karma -- just because something > gets lots of positive karma on N doesn't mean that N-1 is ok. Then > again, the same concern is present in any grouped update if the voters > haven't tried *all* of the packages mentioned. > > Josh Even if you put an update for N and N-1 in the same form, once you submit the request it splits it into two requests, one per Fedora release. This means you'd have one set of karma per Fedora release. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
