On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 10:09:17AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Sat, 2010-03-06 at 20:07 +0100, Till Maas wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 08:14:38AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 13:27 +0100, Till Maas wrote: > > > > > > > Especially it needs to be made sure that only bugs created prior to > > > > adding "F13" to RedHat Bugzilla or the branching of F13, depending on > > > > what happened later, are touched by the "Rawhide bug rebase". > > > > > > We already did that, though tk009 forgot to mention it. If you look at > > > the proposed query, it's cut off at the date of the branch announcement. > > > > The query I was given in IRC does not take into account, which version > > was specified when the bug was created. In the other subthread I > > provided a script to work around this limitation. > > I don't see any reason that would be more accurate than considering the > current specified version. We've never done that with previous rebase > queries. Why do you think it would be more accurate? It is more accurate, because the meaning for "rawhide" changed once the branch happened, because it is then targeting F14 and not F13. So if bug was changed from F13 to rawhide after the branch event, changing it back to F13 is just plain wrong. And the proposed single query does not catch this. Regards Till
Attachment:
pgpz0e4PW6sRh.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
