Re: Proposed udpates policy change

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 14:10 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> ....
> 
> Proposal
> --------

> Comments, questions, reasoned arguments? Part of me wonders if this should be
> expanded with a sliding scale for update types (enhancements, for example, get
> more stringent treatment than bugfix/security).

I've thrown together an extremely quick-n-dirty combination of Bill's
proposal and Kamil's here:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Adamwill/Proposal:Package_update_policy

the wording is very rough, but I hope it's good enough to form a basis
for discussion.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux