On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 01:48:42PM -0500, Jon Masters wrote: >On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 12:26 -0500, Luke Macken wrote: > >> I think a much better solution would be to require similar critical path >> policies, across *all* releases, not just pending ones, while still >> allowing non-critpath packages to go directly to stable. > >That is an acceptable fallback. But just for the record, I consider the >critical path on my desktop to include not just kernel/udev/modules/etc. >but also GNOME, cups, and other things I use each day. I don't >personally care if KDE is updated 20 times a week, or about other >packages that aren't installed by default being rebased often. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/mash/rawhide-20100309/logs/critpath.txt josh -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
