Jesse Keating wrote:
> Yes, you bear some risk in using rawhide. There is no reward without
> risk. We can mitigate some of that risk by placing automated testing
> between the builds and the users. Some reduction in risk is far better
> than no reduction is it not? Would it not be nice to see rawhide
> reports without the huge list of broken deps? Would it not be nice to
> have a rawhide build update that doesn't segfault upon execution? These
> are the kinds of things that happen now, that AutoQA could prevent.
> That makes rawhide vastly more consumable than it currently is.
But it is no replacement for the current non-conservative updates to
releases, whereas the OP's proposal wants to drop those in favor of the
"consumable" Rawhide.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
