On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 09:52:28AM +0100, Dan Horák wrote: > Matthew Garrett píše v Po 08. 03. 2010 v 21:59 +0000: > > This is the policy that I expect to be discussed during the Fesco > > meeting tomorrow. This is entirely orthogonal to the ongoing discussions > > regarding whether updates in stable releases should be expected to > > provide features or purely bugfixes, and I don't see any conflict in > > introducing it before those discussions have concluded. > > > > Introduction > > ------------ > > > > We assume the following axioms: > > I think first should come the answer on "what problem is this proposal > trying to solve?". Is it the plain number of updates? Is it the quality > of updates? What updates failed? > AFAICS, it's to prevent regressions from creeping into the updates repo unnoticed. However, it's not clear what the problematic regression::wanted bugfix ratio is. Plain number of updates would probably be cut down by this proposal but policy that addresses that directly is not present in the current document -- that's been talked about on this list in other threads though. -Toshio
Attachment:
pgpVnrw1CxkUC.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
