Re: Karma threshold for kernel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 10:07:05 -0500, Josh wrote:

> On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 08:55:34AM -0600, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> >Josh Boyer wrote:
> >> 2) Karma after it goes to stable is good for informational purposes, but it
> >> will not cause an update to get removed from Stable.  We don't back out updates
> >> after that are pushed stable except in very rare cases.
> >
> >
> >I'll ask again:
> >
> >Why does bodhi accept karma or comments after the stable push has been 
> >made?

Because it can be useful to comment on the testing _all_ previous karma
submitters have done.

Please keep stable update tickets open for further comments.

> It just causes email spam.

Nah. The same way you could consider all bodhi comments "spam". If you
are the first commenter of a popular package, you receive lots of
notifications for all subsequent comments (where sometimes people
even use bodhi to argue about something).
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux