Re: Should %{name}-javadoc package require %{name}?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




From package guideline

 

Requiring Base Package

Devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}. Usually, subpackages other than -devel should also require the base package using a fully versioned dependency.


 

在2010-03-09 01:42:40,"Ville Skyttä" <ville.skytta@xxxxxx> 写道:
>On Monday 08 March 2010, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
>> Hello All!
>> 
>> I just found that many java-related packages have packaging issues,
>> and one of them draws my attention - explicit "Requires: %{name} =
>> %{version}-%{release}" in some *-javadoc packages. Since my java
>> experience is rather small, I would like to ask you, dear List,
>> whether %{name}-javadoc sub-packages really must require %{name}?
>
>No, unless they actually require something from the main package, which would 
>be unusual.
>-- 
>devel mailing list
>devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux